A GoHalve Implementation Programme · EQUORA Institute

Transforming Communities with the 15-Minute City

Building connections, technology, and vibrant communities for sustainable urban living.

The 15-minute city is not a utopia. It is an engineering problem — and a research question. Living15 is the EQUORA Institute programme that takes that question seriously: what would it actually take to build a local ecosystem capable of sustaining modern life, producing what it needs, and regenerating what it uses?

GoHalve
Footprint reduction goal
15
Minutes to everything
3
Research themes
1
Live NanoLab · Budapest
The Mission behind Living15

GoHalve

GoHalve is a non-profit initiative with a single, measurable goal: to halve humanity's ecological footprint within five years.

Not through guilt. Not through sacrifice. Through design — of cities, of production systems, of water cycles, of daily life. The hypothesis: if we build local environments correctly, the footprint reduction follows as a structural consequence, not a personal virtue.

Living15 is the most complete single tool available for achieving that goal. A local ecosystem that produces what it needs, circulates what it uses, and generates no net burden on the systems that sustain it.

GoHalve certifies products, processes, and communities that demonstrably achieve negative ecological footprints. The Equora Spaces NanoLab is the first candidate for GoHalve certification in Hungary.

GoHalve
Halve humanity's ecological footprint.
In five years.
Not a political statement. A design target. The research question: what local systems, built correctly, make this a structural outcome rather than a personal choice?
gohalve.org →
Community urban space
Empowering the 15-Minute City

At Living15, we study how the city fits together

Most 15-minute city implementations focus on access to services — cafés, schools, parks. They do not address whether anything is actually made locally. The result is a neighbourhood that consumes locally but produces nothing.

"The question is not whether people want to live locally. The question is whether local living can be economically viable, productively satisfying, and ecologically closed."

Living15 research examines the conditions under which a local community can manufacture, maintain, and regenerate the objects and resources of daily life — without losing economic competitiveness.

Live Demonstration · Budapest VII

Equora Spaces NanoLab

The first Living15 NanoLab — a 150m² vaulted brick space in Budapest's 7th district that functions as a working proof of concept for local, custom manufacturing. It demonstrates economic viability, environmental superiority, and replicability.

Digital fabrication

3D printing, laser cutting, UV/MOPA engraving, DTF apparel printing — all under one roof, on demand, for the local community.

Custom & personalised manufacturing

Every object made to specification, eliminating overproduction and the logistics chain of mass-market goods.

Economic model documentation

Real cost and revenue data published as research — because a concept that does not pay for itself does not scale.

GoHalve certification candidate

First Hungarian site undergoing negative ecological footprint verification under the GoHalve certification framework.

Equora Spaces NanoLab · Barcsay utca, Budapest VII · Custom fabrication & local manufacturing
Visit equora.space →
GoHalve
GoHalve · Consistent / Kitartó
Impact presenT
On-demand local manufacturing · DTF · Laser · UV/MOPA · Budapest VII · Observer → Committed → Consistent → Significant → Halver
impactpresent.com →
Research Programme

Three open questions.

01
Urban Systems · Policy · Sociology

Why does the 15-minute city fail — and what would actually make it work?

Most 15-minute city implementations produce zoning maps. What they rarely produce is a functioning local production layer — the capacity to make, repair, and maintain the objects of daily life within the neighbourhood. Without that layer, the 15-minute city is a service-access concept, not a regenerative one. Living15 examines the structural, economic, regulatory, and cultural barriers that prevent local production from scaling — and what conditions allow it to work.

What makes a neighbourhood economically self-sufficient rather than merely conveniently located?
Which regulatory environments enable local manufacturing — and which inadvertently prohibit it?
What is the minimum viable production infrastructure for a Living15 cell?
How does the presence of local fabrication change residents' relationship to objects, waste, and repair?
02
Manufacturing · Psychology · Ecology · Economics

Why is custom and personalised manufacturing better than mass-produced goods?

The conventional objection to local manufacturing is economic: mass production is cheaper. This objection is correct within a narrow accounting frame. It becomes incorrect once the full cost is counted. Living15 builds the case across four domains: Sociologically — mass production severs the maker-user relationship, producing indifference to waste. Psychologically — custom objects generate greater attachment and longer use. Ecologically — on-demand local production eliminates overproduction and transport emissions. Economically — when true costs are included, local manufacturing becomes competitive at lower volumes than assumed.

At what production volume does local custom manufacturing become cost-competitive with imported goods?
How does object attachment differ between mass-produced and custom-made items?
What is the full ecological cost of a mass-produced object from factory to landfill?
What psychological mechanisms drive the preference for personalised goods?
03
Hydrology · Systems Design · Urban Engineering

The future of local water recycling and regeneration

Most cities operate on a linear water system: extract, use, treat, discharge. A genuine Living15 ecosystem requires a closed model — water circulated, cleaned, and returned within the local cell. This research examines technical, regulatory, and economic conditions for neighbourhood-scale water recycling. The GoHalve connection is simple: we track carbon footprints. We rarely track water footprints. A community that cannot account for its water consumption cannot close its resource loop.

What is the minimum infrastructure for a building or block to achieve closed-loop water management?
What would change if we knew our water footprint with the same precision as our carbon footprint?
Which regulatory frameworks enable neighbourhood-scale water recycling?
At what point does decentralised water management become cheaper than centralised municipal infrastructure?
The Diagnosis

What the 15-minute city gets wrong —
and what Living15 corrects

The failures of the 15-minute city are not failures of intent. They are failures of scope. Living15 research identifies three structural gaps — and designs for each.

Current model · Problem

Services without production

Most implementations focus on access to services. They do not address whether anything is made locally. The result: a neighbourhood that consumes locally but produces nothing.

Living15 · Correction

Production as a first-class urban function

Living15 treats manufacturing as a core neighbourhood function — a designed capability that closes the loop between consumption and production.

Current model · Problem

Linear water and waste

Urban resource systems are almost universally linear: materials come in, waste leaves. There is no internal loop. The city is a metabolic importer, not a regenerator.

Living15 · Correction

Closed-loop resource design

Living15 designs for circular material and water flows at neighbourhood scale — treating local regeneration as an engineering specification, not an aspiration.

Current model · Problem

Economic viability assumed, not proven

Local production is typically framed as a values choice — something worth paying more for. This makes it a luxury, accessible only to the environmentally motivated wealthy.

Living15 · Correction

Viability demonstrated, not assumed

The Equora Spaces NanoLab generates real economic data. Living15 publishes cost, revenue, and impact figures — because a model that requires subsidy does not scale.

Get in Touch

Connect with us to explore the 15-minute city concept

Whether you are a researcher, urban planner, manufacturer, or want to visit the NanoLab — we would like to hear from you.